Content, Copy and PR skill 01 of 13

Content Marketing Audit SKILL.md

The Content Marketing Audit skill makes Claude, Codex or another AI agent review a whole content and PR programme. It confirms goals and audiences, builds a full inventory, measures performance beyond pageviews, scores quality and voice with a rubric that flags generic or AI-sounding pieces, reviews distribution, earned media and operations, and decides what to keep, update, combine, repurpose or retire.

content-marketing-audit/SKILL.md, version 1.0.0, 1,535 words.

Most companies publish more than they can explain. Blog posts, guides, newsletters, case studies, press releases, social posts and reports pile up across teams, each made for a reason nobody remembers. Some pieces drive leads every week; many get read by almost no one; some contradict each other or the current product. Without an audit, teams keep producing more of whatever they produced last year, and budgets follow habit rather than results.

This skill audits a content and PR programme as a whole: goals, audiences, inventory, performance, quality, voice, distribution, PR coverage, operations and measurement. It finds what to keep, fix, combine, repurpose or stop, and hands each finding to a specialist skill. It is the entry point for the Content, Copy and PR set. Search-specific content audits sit in the Content SEO skills.

Operating principles

  1. Start from business goals. Content exists to build awareness, demand, trust, sales or retention; judge it against those.
  2. Audience before output. Who is each piece for, and what does it help them do?
  3. Performance includes more than traffic. Leads, pipeline influence, sales use, links, mentions and retention all count.
  4. Quality and voice matter. Accurate, useful, distinctive content earns attention; generic content does not.
  5. Fewer, better. Cutting and combining is often worth more than publishing more.

Audit areas

AreaWhat to checkTypical finding
1. Goals and audiencesDocumented goals, audience definitions, funnel coverageContent written for no clear reader
2. InventoryAll assets by type, topic, owner, dateThousands of posts, no owner list
3. PerformanceTraffic, engagement, conversions, assisted pipeline, links, mentions10% of pieces drive most results
4. QualityAccuracy, depth, originality, evidence, readabilityGeneric posts with no first-hand insight
5. Voice and brandConsistency with brand voice, AI-sounding phrasingEvery author sounds different; some read as machine-written
6. DistributionChannels used per piece, newsletter, social, partners, salesContent published and never promoted
7. PR and earned mediaCoverage, quality of outlets, share of voice, linksPress releases with no pickup
8. OperationsWorkflow, briefs, review, calendar, toolsNo editorial calendar; slow approvals
9. RepurposingReuse of long pieces across formatsResearch reports used once
10. MeasurementMetrics, attribution, reporting cadenceOnly pageviews reported

When to use, and when not to

Use it when content output is high but results are unclear, when a new content or communications lead joins, before annual planning, after rebrands and when budgets are under review.

Don't use it for search-specific audits (the Content SEO content-seo-audit skill) or for social channel audits (the Social Media skills).

Inputs to ask for, in one message

  1. Business goals and target audiences.
  2. Content inventory or sitemap, plus newsletter, case study and PR archives.
  3. Analytics: traffic, engagement and conversions by piece; CRM data on content-assisted deals if available.
  4. Coverage and mentions data (media monitoring, backlinks).
  5. Brand voice or style guide.
  6. Team, workflow and tools used.

Raw SKILL.md file

.md

This is the exact file agents read, including the credit header and licence notice. Save it as content-marketing-audit/SKILL.md.

---
name: content-marketing-audit
description: "Audit a content and PR programme end to end: goals and audiences, a full inventory, performance beyond traffic including leads, pipeline, sales use, links and coverage, a quality and voice rubric that flags generic or AI-sounding pieces, distribution, earned media, operations and keep, update, combine, repurpose or retire decisions. Use whenever someone asks for a content audit, content marketing review, whether content is working, what to stop publishing, PR effectiveness or where to start as a new content lead."
license: CC-BY-4.0
metadata:
  author: Afeez Adebayo
  author_url: https://afeezadebayo.com
  author_linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/afeez-adebayo/
  author_x: https://x.com/za_icon
  source: https://afeezadebayo.com/skills-md/marketing/content-copy-pr/content-marketing-audit/
  category: marketing
  subcategory: content-copy-pr
  version: "1.0.0"
  created: "2026-10-10"
  updated: "2026-10-10"
---

# Content Marketing Audit

Most companies publish more than they can explain. Blog posts, guides, newsletters, case studies, press releases, social posts and reports pile up across teams, each made for a reason nobody remembers. Some pieces drive leads every week; many get read by almost no one; some contradict each other or the current product. Without an audit, teams keep producing more of whatever they produced last year, and budgets follow habit rather than results.

This skill audits a content and PR programme as a whole: goals, audiences, inventory, performance, quality, voice, distribution, PR coverage, operations and measurement. It finds what to keep, fix, combine, repurpose or stop, and hands each finding to a specialist skill. It is the entry point for the Content, Copy and PR set. Search-specific content audits sit in the Content SEO skills.

## Operating principles
1. **Start from business goals.** Content exists to build awareness, demand, trust, sales or retention; judge it against those.
2. **Audience before output.** Who is each piece for, and what does it help them do?
3. **Performance includes more than traffic.** Leads, pipeline influence, sales use, links, mentions and retention all count.
4. **Quality and voice matter.** Accurate, useful, distinctive content earns attention; generic content does not.
5. **Fewer, better.** Cutting and combining is often worth more than publishing more.

## Audit areas
| Area | What to check | Typical finding |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Goals and audiences | Documented goals, audience definitions, funnel coverage | Content written for no clear reader |
| 2. Inventory | All assets by type, topic, owner, date | Thousands of posts, no owner list |
| 3. Performance | Traffic, engagement, conversions, assisted pipeline, links, mentions | 10% of pieces drive most results |
| 4. Quality | Accuracy, depth, originality, evidence, readability | Generic posts with no first-hand insight |
| 5. Voice and brand | Consistency with brand voice, AI-sounding phrasing | Every author sounds different; some read as machine-written |
| 6. Distribution | Channels used per piece, newsletter, social, partners, sales | Content published and never promoted |
| 7. PR and earned media | Coverage, quality of outlets, share of voice, links | Press releases with no pickup |
| 8. Operations | Workflow, briefs, review, calendar, tools | No editorial calendar; slow approvals |
| 9. Repurposing | Reuse of long pieces across formats | Research reports used once |
| 10. Measurement | Metrics, attribution, reporting cadence | Only pageviews reported |

## When to use, and when not to
Use it when content output is high but results are unclear, when a new content or communications lead joins, before annual planning, after rebrands and when budgets are under review.

Don't use it for search-specific audits (the Content SEO `content-seo-audit` skill) or for social channel audits (the Social Media skills).

## Inputs to ask for, in one message
1. Business goals and target audiences.
2. Content inventory or sitemap, plus newsletter, case study and PR archives.
3. Analytics: traffic, engagement and conversions by piece; CRM data on content-assisted deals if available.
4. Coverage and mentions data (media monitoring, backlinks).
5. Brand voice or style guide.
6. Team, workflow and tools used.

## Workflow

### Step 1. Confirm goals and audiences
Write them down if they aren't; map each audience to the stages they move through.

### Step 2. Build the inventory
URL or file, type, topic, audience, stage, owner, published and updated dates.

### Step 3. Add performance
Traffic and engagement, conversions and assisted conversions, sales usage, links and mentions, newsletter clicks.

### Step 4. Sample quality and voice
Review a representative sample against a quality rubric and the voice guide; flag AI-sounding or generic pieces.

### Step 5. Review distribution and PR
Which channels each piece reached; coverage earned and its quality.

### Step 6. Review operations
How ideas become published pieces; bottlenecks and gaps.

### Step 7. Decide per piece
Keep, update, combine, repurpose or retire.

### Step 8. Plan
Priorities for strategy, operations, quality and measurement, with owners.

## Quality rubric
| Criterion | 0 | 1 | 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clear audience and purpose | None | Implied | Explicit |
| Original insight or evidence | None | Some | Strong (data, experience, examples) |
| Accuracy and freshness | Outdated or wrong | Mostly current | Current and sourced |
| Readability | Hard to follow | Acceptable | Clear and scannable |
| Voice | Generic or machine-sounding | Mixed | Distinctive and on brand |
| Next step | None | Vague | Clear and relevant |

## Decision matrix
| Performance | Quality | Action |
|---|---|---|
| High | High | Keep, promote, repurpose |
| High | Low | Update and improve |
| Low | High | Redistribute, repurpose or reposition |
| Low | Low | Combine or retire |

## Inventory columns
| Column | Example |
|---|---|
| URL or file | /blog/month-end-checklist |
| Type | Guide |
| Topic and audience | Month-end close; finance managers |
| Funnel stage | Consideration |
| Owner | Content lead |
| Published and updated | 2024-03, 2025-11 |
| Sessions (12 months) | 18,400 |
| Conversions and assisted deals | 120 trials; 9 deals |
| Links and mentions | 34 referring domains |
| Quality score (0-12) | 10 |
| Decision | Keep and repurpose |

## Distribution check
For a sample of recent pieces, record which channels carried them: newsletter, social, sales enablement, partners, paid promotion, communities, PR. Pieces that reached only the blog rarely perform, however good they are.

## Edge cases and judgement calls
| Situation | What to do |
|---|---|
| Huge archive | Audit by sample and by templates; focus on top and bottom performers |
| B2B with long cycles | Weight sales usage and assisted pipeline, not just traffic |
| Regulated industries | Add compliance review status to the inventory |
| Several brands or products | Audit each with shared criteria |
| PR-heavy programmes | Weight coverage quality and message pull-through |

## Handoffs to specialist skills
- Strategy: `content-strategy`
- Workflow and calendar: `editorial-operations`
- Voice: `brand-voice-guide`
- Copy: `marketing-copywriting`
- Editing: `editing-proofreading`
- AI-sounding text: `ai-writing-cleanup`
- Newsletters: `newsletter-strategy`
- Thought leadership: `thought-leadership`
- Research reports: `original-research-reports`
- Digital PR: `digital-pr`
- Repurposing: `content-repurposing`
- Measurement: `content-pr-measurement`
- Search content: the Content SEO skills

## Worked example
A B2B software company published four blog posts a week, a monthly newsletter and frequent press releases, but leadership couldn't see results. The audit found 8% of posts drove most sign-ups and sales-assisted deals, while half had almost no readers; posts written by agencies scored lowest on originality and often sounded machine-written; press releases about minor updates earned no coverage, while one customer data story earned dozens of links. The plan cut output to one strong piece a week, rebuilt the voice guide, combined thin posts into guides, repurposed the data story into a recurring annual report and shifted PR towards data and customer stories.

## Output format
```
# Content and PR audit: <company>, <date>
## Summary (biggest gap, biggest opportunity, first moves)
## Goals and audiences
## Inventory and performance overview
## Quality and voice findings
## Distribution and PR findings
## Operations findings
## Decisions by piece or group
## 90-day plan with owners
```

## Common mistakes
- Judging content only by traffic.
- Auditing without written goals and audiences.
- Publishing more instead of fixing what exists.
- Ignoring distribution.
- Counting press releases instead of coverage quality.

## Questions to ask before you recommend changes
- What is content supposed to achieve for the business?
- Which pieces do customers and sales actually use?
- What earned coverage or links, and why?

## Self-check before you answer
- Are findings tied to goals and audiences?
- Is performance broader than pageviews?
- Are quality and voice reviewed with a rubric?
- Does every piece or group get a clear decision?

## Further reading
- Content Marketing Institute research: https://contentmarketinginstitute.com/research/
- Ann Handley, Everybody Writes (2nd edition, 2022)

---
Created by Afeez Adebayo, Marketing, SEO & Growth Expert
Website: https://afeezadebayo.com
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/afeez-adebayo/
X: https://x.com/za_icon
Source: https://afeezadebayo.com/skills-md/marketing/content-copy-pr/content-marketing-audit/

Licence: CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). You may copy, share and adapt this skill, including for commercial use, as long as you credit Afeez Adebayo and link to the source URL above. Keep this notice in any copy or adapted version.

Workflow

Step 1. Confirm goals and audiences

Write them down if they aren't; map each audience to the stages they move through.

Step 2. Build the inventory

URL or file, type, topic, audience, stage, owner, published and updated dates.

Step 3. Add performance

Traffic and engagement, conversions and assisted conversions, sales usage, links and mentions, newsletter clicks.

Step 4. Sample quality and voice

Review a representative sample against a quality rubric and the voice guide; flag AI-sounding or generic pieces.

Step 5. Review distribution and PR

Which channels each piece reached; coverage earned and its quality.

Step 6. Review operations

How ideas become published pieces; bottlenecks and gaps.

Step 7. Decide per piece

Keep, update, combine, repurpose or retire.

Step 8. Plan

Priorities for strategy, operations, quality and measurement, with owners.

Quality rubric

Criterion012
Clear audience and purposeNoneImpliedExplicit
Original insight or evidenceNoneSomeStrong (data, experience, examples)
Accuracy and freshnessOutdated or wrongMostly currentCurrent and sourced
ReadabilityHard to followAcceptableClear and scannable
VoiceGeneric or machine-soundingMixedDistinctive and on brand
Next stepNoneVagueClear and relevant

Decision matrix

PerformanceQualityAction
HighHighKeep, promote, repurpose
HighLowUpdate and improve
LowHighRedistribute, repurpose or reposition
LowLowCombine or retire

Inventory columns

ColumnExample
URL or file/blog/month-end-checklist
TypeGuide
Topic and audienceMonth-end close; finance managers
Funnel stageConsideration
OwnerContent lead
Published and updated2024-03, 2025-11
Sessions (12 months)18,400
Conversions and assisted deals120 trials; 9 deals
Links and mentions34 referring domains
Quality score (0-12)10
DecisionKeep and repurpose

Distribution check

For a sample of recent pieces, record which channels carried them: newsletter, social, sales enablement, partners, paid promotion, communities, PR. Pieces that reached only the blog rarely perform, however good they are.

Edge cases and judgement calls

SituationWhat to do
Huge archiveAudit by sample and by templates; focus on top and bottom performers
B2B with long cyclesWeight sales usage and assisted pipeline, not just traffic
Regulated industriesAdd compliance review status to the inventory
Several brands or productsAudit each with shared criteria
PR-heavy programmesWeight coverage quality and message pull-through

Handoffs to specialist skills

  • Strategy: content-strategy
  • Workflow and calendar: editorial-operations
  • Voice: brand-voice-guide
  • Copy: marketing-copywriting
  • Editing: editing-proofreading
  • AI-sounding text: ai-writing-cleanup
  • Newsletters: newsletter-strategy
  • Thought leadership: thought-leadership
  • Research reports: original-research-reports
  • Digital PR: digital-pr
  • Repurposing: content-repurposing
  • Measurement: content-pr-measurement
  • Search content: the Content SEO skills

Worked example

A B2B software company published four blog posts a week, a monthly newsletter and frequent press releases, but leadership couldn't see results. The audit found 8% of posts drove most sign-ups and sales-assisted deals, while half had almost no readers; posts written by agencies scored lowest on originality and often sounded machine-written; press releases about minor updates earned no coverage, while one customer data story earned dozens of links. The plan cut output to one strong piece a week, rebuilt the voice guide, combined thin posts into guides, repurposed the data story into a recurring annual report and shifted PR towards data and customer stories.

Output format

# Content and PR audit: <company>, <date>
## Summary (biggest gap, biggest opportunity, first moves)
## Goals and audiences
## Inventory and performance overview
## Quality and voice findings
## Distribution and PR findings
## Operations findings
## Decisions by piece or group
## 90-day plan with owners

Common mistakes

  • Judging content only by traffic.
  • Auditing without written goals and audiences.
  • Publishing more instead of fixing what exists.
  • Ignoring distribution.
  • Counting press releases instead of coverage quality.

Questions to ask before you recommend changes

  • What is content supposed to achieve for the business?
  • Which pieces do customers and sales actually use?
  • What earned coverage or links, and why?

Self-check before you answer

  • Are findings tied to goals and audiences?
  • Is performance broader than pageviews?
  • Are quality and voice reviewed with a rubric?
  • Does every piece or group get a clear decision?

Further reading

When to use this skill, and when not to

Use it when output is high but results are unclear, when a new content or communications lead joins, before annual planning, after rebrands and when budgets are under review.

Most companies publish more than they can explain. A few pieces drive leads every week, many are read by almost nobody and some contradict the current product. Without an audit, teams keep producing more of whatever they made last year.

Don’t use it for search-specific audits (use the Content SEO Content SEO Audit) or social channel audits.

Example prompts

  • “We publish four posts a week. Is any of it working?”
  • “Audit our blog, newsletter and press releases.”
  • “Which content should we stop producing?”
  • “I just joined as head of content. Where do I start?”
  • “Score our content for quality and brand voice.”

Example output

The skill returns a fixed structure. A shortened example for an imaginary site:

# Content and PR audit: example B2B software, 11 October 2026

Finding: 8% of posts drive most sign-ups and assisted deals
Quality: agency posts score lowest on originality; several read as machine-written
PR: minor-update press releases earned no coverage; one data story earned dozens of links

Plan: one strong piece a week; rebuild voice guide; combine thin posts; annual data report; PR on data and customer stories

Performance is judged on leads, pipeline influence, sales use, links and coverage, not pageviews alone.

What the agent needs from you

The skill asks for business goals and audiences, a content inventory with newsletter, case study and PR archives, analytics and CRM data on content-assisted deals, coverage and backlink data, the brand voice guide and your team, workflow and tools.

How this skill hands off to related skills

How to run the Content Marketing Audit step by step

  1. Install the skill as content-marketing-audit/SKILL.md, with the other 12 skills in the set.
  2. Write down goals and audiences.
  3. Build the inventory with owners and dates.
  4. Add performance beyond pageviews.
  5. Score quality and voice on a sample.
  6. Decide per piece and plan 90 days.

Situations this skill handles

Content programmes vary. The audit handles these situations:

SituationWhat the skill does
Huge archiveSamples by template
Long B2B cyclesWeights sales use and pipeline
Regulated industriesAdds compliance status
Several brandsShared criteria per brand
PR-heavy programmesCoverage quality and messages
AI-heavy outputFlags generic and machine-sounding pieces

What makes this skill different

Most content audits count pageviews. This skill measures what content does for the business, scores quality and voice, reviews whether pieces were ever distributed and includes PR coverage alongside owned content.

Every piece or group ends with a clear decision, so the audit changes what the team produces next.

Practical tips from real projects

  • Start from business goals.
  • Audience before output.
  • Performance beyond traffic.
  • Fewer, better pieces.

A worked example: a B2B software company published four blog posts a week, a monthly newsletter and frequent press releases, but leadership could not see results. The audit found 8% of posts drove most sign-ups and sales-assisted deals while half had almost no readers. Posts written by agencies scored lowest on originality and often sounded machine-written. Press releases about minor updates earned no coverage, while one customer data story earned dozens of links. The plan cut output to one strong piece a week, rebuilt the voice guide, combined thin posts into guides, turned the data story into an annual report and shifted PR towards data and customer stories.

The audit covers ten areas: goals and audiences, inventory, performance, quality, voice and brand, distribution, PR and earned media, operations, repurposing and measurement. Typical findings include content written for no clear reader, archives with no owners, a small share of pieces driving most results, generic posts without first-hand insight, authors who all sound different, pieces published and never promoted, press releases with no pickup, missing calendars and research used only once.

The quality rubric scores six criteria from 0 to 2: clear audience and purpose, original insight or evidence, accuracy and freshness, readability, voice and a clear next step. A total out of 12 makes pieces comparable across authors and agencies.

The decision matrix combines performance and quality. High performance and high quality means keep, promote and repurpose. High performance and low quality means update and improve. Low performance and high quality means redistribute, repurpose or reposition. Low performance and low quality means combine or retire.

The inventory records URL or file, type, topic and audience, funnel stage, owner, publish and update dates, sessions, conversions and assisted deals, links and mentions, quality score and decision, so the team can sort and filter instead of guessing.

The distribution check records which channels carried each recent piece: newsletter, social, sales enablement, partners, paid promotion, communities and PR. Pieces that reached only the blog rarely perform, however good they are.

The final plan sets 90-day priorities for strategy, operations, quality and measurement, each with an owner.

Performance goes beyond traffic: conversions and assisted conversions, content used by sales in deals, links and mentions earned, newsletter clicks and customer engagement all count. For B2B companies with long cycles, sales usage and assisted pipeline often matter far more than visits. PR-heavy programmes are judged on coverage in relevant outlets and message pull-through rather than the number of releases sent, and regulated industries add compliance review status to the inventory so outdated claims are caught.

Operations are reviewed too: how ideas become published pieces, where drafts wait and which approvals slow everything down, because quality problems often start in the workflow rather than with writers.

Frequently asked questions

Goals and audiences, an inventory, performance including leads, pipeline, links and coverage, quality and voice, distribution, PR, operations and a decision for each piece.

With a rubric covering audience and purpose, original insight, accuracy, readability, voice and a clear next step.

High-quality pieces get redistributed or repurposed; low-quality ones are combined or retired.

Coverage and links are content outcomes too, and press releases often consume effort without results.

Sample by template and focus on top and bottom performers.

Yearly, and when goals, teams or budgets change.

Changelog

  • 1.0.0, 10 October 2026: first release.

Use, adapt and share this skill under CC BY 4.0: credit Afeez Adebayo and link to this page.